In a recent tweet https://tinyurl.com/3c4da2fv our EBSWA colleague @prof_curiosity1 set out convincing evidence that the "transchild" is an invention needed "to validate the sexual fetishes of autogynephiles and make transgenderism palatable for the public."
It is remarkable that the sudden appearance of the "transchild" was met by an almost complete lack of professional curiosity, abandoned along with any responsibility for safeguarding children. Social workers to rediscover professional curiosity and
Read some Piaget please! @prof_curiosity1
THE POST IN FULL
"A question transactivism cannot answer. Where were all the 'transchildren' from 1920-2000 when Piaget, Kohlberg, Bandura, Vygotsky, Erikson, Bowlby, Steiner etc along with their students (and their vociferous critics) were spending tens of thousands of hours doing empirical research on children? Research that involved studying children at home, in nursery and at school. Studies that involved writing down every action, statement, or question that the child asked. And then analysing these recordings for patterns and insights. Not one of them observed a 'transchild' in all this time. So where were all the 'transchildren'?
The logical answer is, of course, nowhere, as they were not yet required. They were not invented as a typology until the 2000s when the trans movement needed children to validate the sexual fetishes of autogynephiles and make transgenderism palatable for the public. The only other answer is a conspiracy theory. That research showing transchildren existed was suppressed; rather like alien conspiracy theorists talk about Area 51 in Nevada USA. If we ignore the conspiracy theory, we are left with the answer that no child was trans until the 'transchild' was needed, in the 2000s, to demonstrate the universality of 'gender identity'.
Children, sadly, were the logical choice due to their undeveloped brains/thinking and their vulnerability. It is not hard to persuade children that Santa exists or even that sexual abuse is a normal part of family life. 'Gender identity' can easily be packaged to appeal to the magical thinking of children. 'Transchildren' have thus become the main focus of transgenderism. For the activists know that without the winsome, photogenic 'transchild', groomed to repeat adult phrases about 'gender identity' the movement consists in the main of adult males with a fetish for dressing up as women.
Transgender ideology needs 'transchildren' to survive. It needs them to harm themselves and kill themselves to demonstrate that the ideology is real. We need to protect our children. And we can start by debunking the idea and existence of the 'transchild'."
8:13 AM · Sep 8, 2024
Comments